WOLFEBORO, NH —
OSHA Inspection: MARK HOLLAND
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MARK HOLLAND in 138 HOLDEN SHORES RD., WOLFEBORO, NH 03894 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342343753.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARK HOLLAND
- Site address
- 138 HOLDEN SHORES RD.
- City
- WOLFEBORO
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03894
- Mailing
- 423 BEACH POND RD., WOLFEBORO, NH 03894
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets: a. Site - Employees working with a crane to fly roof panels into position were not provided with head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.304 I01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1): Each circular had-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood whcih completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut. a. Site - Employees operating a Bosch table saw were not protected from amputation hazards when the guard was not installed on the saw.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. Site - Employees using portable power tools were not protected from electrical shocks and burns when the insulation was pulled away from the area where an electrical cord entered the outlet box, exposing the wiring beneath.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $1630
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports. a. Site - Employees working from a fabricated frame scaffold were not protected from falls between 8 and 12 feet when decking did not span the entire length between uprights.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. a. Site - Employees working from scaffolds were not protected from falls when guardrails were not installed and no other means of fall protection was provided.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F15 I
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(i): A ladder placed against a structure which was not part of the scaffold was not secured against the sideways thrust exerted by the ladder: a. Site - An employee was exposed to falls of approximately 15 feet while working from a ladder set up on the working surface of a fabricated frame scaffold that was not secured to prevent tipping caused by the sideways thrust of the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: a. Site - An employee was exposed to falls of approximately 15 feet while working from a fiberglass step ladder set up on the working surface of a fabricated frame scaffold which was in the closed position and leaned against the ridge beam.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. Site - Employees were not protected from while working from fabricated frame scaffolds without receiving scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site - employees were not protected from falls when exposed to floor and wall openings while working from the second story and roof of the building.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site - Employees were not protected from falls of approximately 8 feet when the opening around the stairway between the second and first floors was unguarded. b. Site - Employees were not protected from falls of approximately 10 feet when window and wall openings from the second floor were not guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: a. Site - The stairway connecting the first and second floor was not equipped with a handrail.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Mark Holland
View Mark Holland's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342343753.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.