Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SULLY HOLDINGS, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SULLY HOLDINGS, LLC. in 1033 REEVES ST, DUNMORE, PA 18512 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342348109.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sully Holdings, LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sully Holdings, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1033 REEVES ST
City
DUNMORE
State
PA
ZIP
18512
Mailing
1033 REEVES ST, DUNMORE, PA 18512
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 P01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2017
Abate by
Jul 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    a) In the Garage:  The Clark propane forklift model number GC520I was in need of repair and it was not taken out of service. Employees were exposed to crush-by and struck-by hazards as observed on or about May 25, 2017.                                               ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2017
Abate by
Jul 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:        a) In the Garage:  The Clark propane forklift model number GC520I was not inspected before being placed in operation. Employees were exposed to crush-by and struck-by hazards as observed on or about May 25, 2017.                                                ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2017
Abate by
Jul 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a) At the facility:  The employer did not conduct an evaluation of each forklift operator at least every three years, as observed on or about May 25, 2017.                                                                 ABATMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2017
Abate by
Jul 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    a) At the facility:  The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated, as observed on or about May 25, 2017.                                                                 ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2017
Abate by
Jul 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:       a) At the Faculty: Employees worked with hazardous chemicals, including, but not limited to, phenols and hydrogen cyanide found in the insulation products (USA Premium Foam Resin), and the employer did not provide these employees with the required training on the new label elements and safety data sheet format as required by the revised OSHA Hazard Communication Standard incorporating the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals prior to the effective date of December 1, 2013, as observed on or about May 25, 2017.                                                             ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342348109.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.