CORTLAND, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: ALL CUSTOM LOG CABIN CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALL CUSTOM LOG CABIN CONSTRUCTION in 178 HINMAN ROAD, CORTLAND, NY 13045 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342348547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALL CUSTOM LOG CABIN CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 178 HINMAN ROAD
- City
- CORTLAND
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13045
- Mailing
- 5731 SNELLER ROAD, BREWERTON, NY 13029
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: a) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working from a job built platform elevated on the forks of a rough terrain fork-truck.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $3803
- · C (S) $3803
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: a) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working from a job built platform elevated on the forks of a rough terrain fork-truck. This platform was moved horizontally from the second story deck where the workers stepped onto it, to the side of the building at the same level where they were working when observed. This platform was not secured to the forks or mast of the fork-lift.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working from a ladder-jack scaffold, 16 feet from ground without fall protection of any kind.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $3803
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working from a job built platform elevated on the forks of a rough terrain fork-truck, at 10, 12, and 16 feet from ground without fall protection of any kind. b) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working and transiting on a two-level deck system that was 8 feet 4 inches and 7 feet 7 inches from ground without fall protection of any kind. c) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were working on the main level of the building and using the stairwell into the basement level where that stairwell did not have guardrails, exposing employees to falls of 8 feet to the basement level
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $3803
- · C (S) $3803
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $894 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) At the jobsite, on or about 5/24/17: Employees were accessing the deck system at the front of the building on an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet from its upper landing at 7 feet 7 inches.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $894
- · C (S) $2716
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342348547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.