MOSCOW, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: NAMMO POCAL INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NAMMO POCAL INCORPORATED in ROUTE 435 COVINGTON TOWNSHIP, MOSCOW, PA 18444 (NAICS 332993). OSHA activity number 342348620.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NAMMO POCAL INCORPORATED
- Site address
- ROUTE 435 COVINGTON TOWNSHIP
- City
- MOSCOW
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18444
- Mailing
- 100 ELECTRIC STREET, SCRANTON, PA 18509
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332993
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.109 B01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,157 · Current $3,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.109(b)(1): Explosives or blasting agents were stored, handled, and/or transported when such storage, handling, and transporting of such explosives or blasting agents constituted an undue hazard to life. a) Primer conditioning rooms in Building #2; primers were stored in the conditioning rooms which contained electric resistance baseboard heat system and components, on or about, August 8, 2017. b) Primer conditioning rooms in Building #2; primers were stored in the conditioning rooms which contained electric incandescent light bulbs and components for lighting, on or about, August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3100
- · Z (S) $6157
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes (except for "replacements in kind") to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process. a) Building #2; the employer failed to establish written procedures to manage the addition of the primer conditioning process, which occurred on or about calendar year 2016, observed August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,617 · Current $3,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1910.119(e)(3)(i) The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process. a) Fuse loading process in Building #2, the process hazard analysis did not address electrical classification and the potential for an electrical malfunction in the uncovered duplex outlets located underneath the FillPro machine stations, and in the vicinity of the fiberboard propellant containers, on or about, August 8, 2017. b) Fuse loading process in Building #2, the process hazard analysis did not address electrical classification and the potential for an electrical malfunction of the ceiling mounted incandescent lighting located above the FillPro machine stations, on or about, August 8, 2017. c) Fuse loading process in Building #2, the process hazard analysis did not address electrical classification and the potential for an electrical malfunction of the battery powered hand held flashlights used to check propellant levels in the fuses, on or about, August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3700
- · Z (S) $4617
1910.119 E03 IV
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.119(e)(3)(iv) The process hazard analysis did not address consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. a) Fuse loading process in Building #2; the process hazard analysis did not address the potential that the floor positioned fiberboard over-flow container used to collect propellant and dust, could spill and create a dust cloud in the vicinity of unapproved electrical installations, on or about, August 8, 2017. b) Fuse loading process in Building #2; the process hazard analysis did not address the potential that employees would not ever empty the floor positioned fiberboard over-flow container used to collect propellant and dust, and the propellant could back up into the FillPro machine, on or about, August 8, 2017. d) Fuse loading process in Building #2; the process hazard analysis did not address an unexpected loss of electrical power and the potential that the FillPro machine did not restart in the expected manner while the propellant is contained within the machine, on or about, August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 VI
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.119(e)(3)(vi) The process hazard analysis did not address human factors. a) Fuse loading process in Building #2; the process hazard analysis did not address the potential for the hand held, battery powered, un-rated flashlights to be taken by other employees who did not work at the workstation where the flashlight was to be used. The use of an un-rated flashlight could create potential explosion hazards in other areas of Building #2, on or about, August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 F03
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.119(f)(3) Operating procedures were not reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflected current operating practice, including changes that resulted from addition of equipment. a) Fuse loading process in Building #2; the operating procedures for the fuse loading process in Building #2, did not reflect the added use of hand held battery powered flashlights to illuminate the interior of the fuse and determine the amount of propellant within the fuse after loading, on or about, August 8, 2017. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Nammo Pocal Incorporated
View Nammo Pocal Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332993)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342348620.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.