HOMESTEAD, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: COASTAL EXTERIOR SERVICES, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COASTAL EXTERIOR SERVICES, INC. in 301 WATERFRONT DRIVE, HOMESTEAD, PA 15120 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342354354.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COASTAL EXTERIOR SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 301 WATERFRONT DRIVE
- City
- HOMESTEAD
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15120
- Mailing
- 3842 SALEM CHURCH ROAD, JARRETTSVILLE, MD 21084
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets: a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the basket of an aerial lift under the bottom of a car port type structure wore appropriate head protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the basket of an aerial lift wore appropriate fall protection. Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): Top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that equivalent guardrail systems were of adequate height in that an employee performed painting on a roof where existing parapet walls along the outer edges were determined to be only 2 feet in height, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of at least 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record that contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer or where the employer relied on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record did not indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training: a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection training records were maintained for an employee who was performing work on a roof where a fall hazard of at least 12 feet existed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342354354.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.