Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL EXTERIOR SERVICES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COASTAL EXTERIOR SERVICES, INC. in 301 WATERFRONT DRIVE, HOMESTEAD, PA 15120 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342354354.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Exterior Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Exterior Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
301 WATERFRONT DRIVE
City
HOMESTEAD
State
PA
ZIP
15120
Mailing
3842 SALEM CHURCH ROAD, JARRETTSVILLE, MD 21084
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets:      a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the basket of an aerial lift under the bottom of a car port type structure wore appropriate head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1100
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:      a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the basket of an aerial lift wore appropriate fall protection.     Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.502 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): Top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level:      a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that equivalent guardrail systems were of adequate height in that an employee performed painting on a roof where existing parapet walls along the outer edges were determined to be only 2 feet in height, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of at least 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1100
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2017
Abate by
Jun 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record that contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer or where the employer relied on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record did not indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training:   a) Job site, 301 Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA: On or about May 25, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection training records were maintained for an employee who was performing work on a roof where a fall hazard of at least 12 feet existed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342354354.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.