Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J-KRAFT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of J-KRAFT, INC. in 3040 GREENS ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77032 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 342357332.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J-Kraft, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J-Kraft, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J-KRAFT, INC.
Site address
3040 GREENS ROAD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77032
Mailing
4643 EAST RICHEY ROAD, HUMBLE, TX 77338
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:       On or about May 25, 2017, located in Spray Booth #4 where an employee was exposed to fire hazards when performing painting tasks in a spray booth without an automatic sprinkler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.107 C02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame(s) or spark producing equipment, not separated by a partition, were located within 20 feet of spraying area(s):        a) On or about May 25, 2017, located in the spray area adjacent to Spray Booth #2 where equipment such as, but not limited to, lights, electrical boxes and a microwave were within 20 feet of a spraying area exposing an employee to fire hazards.      b) On or about May 25, 2017, located in Spray Booth #4 where a lighting fixture with a missing bulb was within 20 feet of a spraying area exposing an employee to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.107 C05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s):    On or about May 25, 2017, located in Spray Booth #4 where an employee was exposed to fire hazards when using 30 inch Strongway pedestal fans that had paint residue deposits on the fans.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:      On or about May 25, 2017, in the paint department where employees were required to wear 3M 7502 half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters when performing painting tasks without developing a respirator program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:    On or about May 25, 2017, in the paint department where employees were required to wear 3M 7502 half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters when performing painting tasks without being provided respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      On or about May 25, 2017, in the paint department where employees were required to wear 3M 7502 half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters when performing painting tasks without a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:      On or about May 25, 2017, in the paint department where employees were required to wear 3M 7502 half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters when performing painting tasks without a respirator fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:     On or about May 25, 2017, in the paint department where an employee with facial hair wore a 3M 7502 half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters when performing painting tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $4,708 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:          On or about March 25, 2017, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire and inhalation hazards when working with chemicals such as, but not limited to, lacquers, varnish, and primer without providing information on the availability of the hazard communication program and safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4708
  • — Z (S) $7243

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   On or about March 25, 2017, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire and inhalation hazards when working with chemicals such as, but not limited to, lacquers, varnish, and primer without providing training on container labeling and safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View J-Kraft, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342357332.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.