Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONSOLIDATED BUILDERS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONSOLIDATED BUILDERS, INC. in 2300 DIERS AVE, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68803 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 342364361.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Consolidated Builders, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Consolidated Builders, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2300 DIERS AVE
City
GRAND ISLAND
State
NE
ZIP
68803
Mailing
15155 COUNTY ROAD 19, FORT MORGAN, CO 80701
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  This provision is applicable to construction employment by 1926.59: The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical hazards associated with using exterior wall products on the job site without having developed a written hazardous communications program.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has not developed a written HAZCOM program and has employees applying Sto Primer/Adhesive-B, 80101 adhesive to the exterior of the building as means of adhering the foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):  This provision is applicable to construction employment by 1926.59: The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:  The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical hazards associated with using exterior wall products on the job site without maintaining safety data sheets for employee review.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees applying Sto Primer/Adhesive-B, 80101 adhesive to the exterior of the building as means of adhering the foam insulation to the building without maintaining safety data sheets on site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): This provision is applicable to construction employment by 1926.59: The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:                          The employer is failing to train employees on the chemical hazards associated with using exterior wall products on the job site without as well as familiarizing them with safety data sheets and product labeling.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees applying Sto Primer/Adhesive-B, 80101 adhesive to the exterior of the building as means of adhering the foam insulation to the building without maintaining safety data sheets on site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:                                                                                                             The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical and struck by hazards associated with employees not being provided or using eye and face protection while applying exterior wall products on the job site.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees applying Sto Primer/Adhesive-B, 80101 adhesive to the exterior of the building as means of adhering the foam insulation to the building without wearing eye and face protection as mandated on the label by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person:   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of inadequate scaffolding.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employers lack of a competent person as part of the construction and inspection process, has employees working off inadequate scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 32 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding that was not fully planked on all working levels.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees working off a single aluminum plank and exposed to fall hazards while applying the exterior surface to a new commercial business.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 32 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2):  Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding planking that was less than 18 inches wide.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees working off 14 inch wide aluminum planks and exposed to fall hazards while applying the exterior surface to a new commercial business.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i):  The employer did not ensure that platforms 10 feet or less in length did not extend over the support more than 12 inches:   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding with improperly installed planking.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees working off of planking that overlaps the supports by more than 12 inches on a two level frame scaffold system while applying the exterior surface to a new commercial business.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 19 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:                                                                                   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of inadequate scaffolding.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees working off scaffolding that has instances of missing base plates and mud sills.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,950 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3):  The employer did not ensure that scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of inadequate scaffolding.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employers lack of inspection has employees using inadequate scaffolding as means of access to the commercial building they are working on.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems were installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.                                                                                                                                          The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of inadequate scaffolding.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has employees working off scaffolding levels more than 10 feet above the ground without guard railing to protect against fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,950 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedure(s) to control or minimize those hazards:                                                                                                          The employer is failing to train employees to recognize and identify hazards associated with using scaffolding to perform their duties.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident on May 31, 2017 at the job site located at 2300 Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE where the employer has inadequately trained employees using scaffolding with multiple instances of inadequacies as means of a work surface to perform their duties.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950
  • — Z (S) $3803

View Consolidated Builders, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342364361.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.