HUDSON, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: PRINCETON TECHNOLOGY CORP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PRINCETON TECHNOLOGY CORP in 33 CONSTITUTION DRIVE, HUDSON, NH 03051 (NAICS 334412). OSHA activity number 342367059.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRINCETON TECHNOLOGY CORP
- Site address
- 33 CONSTITUTION DRIVE
- City
- HUDSON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03051
- Mailing
- 33 CONSTITUTION DRIVE, HUDSON, NH 03051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334412
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.29 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,169 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(1): The top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, were not 42 inches, plus or minus 3 inches, above the walking-working surface: Location: mezzanine On or about 5/24/17, the top rail of the guard rail and loading gates on the mezzanine were only 38 and 35 inches respectively above the walking surface thus exposing employees to falls between 11feet and 13.5 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3169
- · Z (S) $6338
1910.107 D04
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(4): The fan-rotating element was not nonferrous or nonsparking or such material did not comprise or line the casing: Location: paint spray booth on the mezzanine On or about 5/24/17, the exhaust blower for the spray paint booth was not made of non-sparking or nonferrous metal and exposed an employee to burns from fire while using flammable spray paint.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2535
- · Z (S) $5070
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: Location: Mezzanine next to the paint booth On or about 5/24/17, the employer did not ensure a 24 inch long horizontal shaft located in close proximity to a work station was guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2535
- · Z (S) $5070
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Shaft ends projecting more than one-half the diameter of the shaft were not guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves. Location: Mezzanine next to the paint booth On or about 5/24/17, the employer did not ensure a one inch diameter horizontal shaft end projecting approximately three inches beyond the pulley was guarded. The projecting shaft end was in close proximity to a work station.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Location: Mezzanine next to the paint booth On or about 5/24/17, the employer did not ensure a pulley in close proximity to a work station was guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o) Location: mezzanine next to the paint booth. On or about 5/24/17, the employer did not ensure a vertical belt in close proximity to a work station was guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: (a) Location: main production area On or about 7/6/17, flexible cables were used in place of fixed wiring on the Vitronics Soltec reflow ovens. (b) Location: wash room On or about 7/6/17, flexible cables were used in place of fixed wiring on the wave solder.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $6338
More inspections at Princeton Technology Corp
View Princeton Technology Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334412)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342367059.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.