Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: G.H. TUCKPOINTING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of G.H. TUCKPOINTING INC. in 2157 W. IRVING PARK ROAD, CHICAGO, IL 60618 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342367901.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch G.H. Tuckpointing INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for G.H. Tuckpointing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2157 W. IRVING PARK ROAD
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60618
Mailing
2248 N. LAPORTE AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60639
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2017
Abate by
Dec 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:     G.H. Tuckpointing Inc., failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:   Citation Number            Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                01                                            09/15/2017 01                                02                                            09/21/2017 01                                03                                            09/21/2017 01                                04                                            09/15/2017 01                                05                                            09/21/2017  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $305

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.  a) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on a red tubular welded frame scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a red tubular welded frame scaffold that did not have base plates.  The scaffold legs rested on plywood on the sidewalk and over a drainage grate.  b) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on a yellow tubular welded frame scaffold without base plates.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by installing guys, ties, and braces:  a) On May 31, 2017, a red tubular welded frame scaffold in excess of the 4:1 height to base ratio was not secured to prevent tipping, exposing employees to fall hazards.  b) On May 31, 2017, a yellow tubular welded frame scaffold in excess of the 4:1 height to base ratio was not secured to prevent tipping, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to a fall of approximately eleven feet to the concrete sidewalk below while working from a yellow tubular welded frame scaffold without guardrails.    b) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to a fall of up to 22 feet to the concrete sidewalk below while working from a red tubular welded frame scaffold without guardrails.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not secured together by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which secure vertical members together laterally:  a) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working from a red tubular welded frame scaffold that only had cross-bracing on one side of the scaffold.  b) On May 31, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working from a yellow tubular welded frame scaffold that only had cross-bracing on one side of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

View G.H. Tuckpointing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342367901.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.