Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ALIAKSEI OSIPCHYK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALIAKSEI OSIPCHYK in 9070 ST. SIMONS WAY, PITTSBURGH, PA 15237 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342368404.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aliaksei Osipchyk for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aliaksei Osipchyk is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALIAKSEI OSIPCHYK
Site address
9070 ST. SIMONS WAY
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15237
Mailing
515 GRANDVIEW ROAD, CARNEGIE, PA 15106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:      a) Job site 9070 St. Simons Way, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about May 31, 2017, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee in an aerial lift utilized appropriate fall protection.     Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1358
  • · C (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:      Instances including, but not limited to, the following:    a) Job site 9070 St. Simons Way, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about May 31, 2017, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee on top of a roof located at the front corner of the building used appropriate fall protection systems/devices where exposed to a fall hazard of over 9 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1087
  • · C (S) $2173
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   a) Job site 9070 St. Simons Way, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about May 31, 2017, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee in aerial lift working under a roof overhang used protective head wear.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342368404.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.