LINCOLN, NE ·
OSHA Inspection: EDIS MONGE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDIS MONGE in 2406 J ST, LINCOLN, NE 68510 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342371549.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDIS MONGE
- Site address
- 2406 J ST
- City
- LINCOLN
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68510
- Mailing
- 3930 SAN MATEO LN, LINCOLN, NE 68516
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical hazards when conducting roofing operations on a commercial structure. This was most recently documented at 2406 J St, Lincoln, NE, on or about June 2, 2017 when employees were observed on a 2 story commercial building and they climbed a metal ladder that extended under an energized power line.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2716
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards when conducting roofing operations on a commercial structure with a steep roof. This was most recently documented at 2406 J St, Lincoln, NE, on or about 6/2/2017 when employees were observed installing shingles to a commercial structure while working greater than 6 feet above the ground without fall protection in use.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $3803
- · I (S) $2500
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards when conducting roofing operations on commercial structures. This was most recently documented at 2406 J St, Lincoln, NE, on or about June 2, 2017, when 5 employees were on a steep roof and they had not received fall protection training.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $1630
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1630
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards when conducting roofing operations on a commercial structure. This was most recently observed at 2406 J St, Lincoln NE, on or about June 2, 2017 when employees were using a non self supporting ladder that was not positioned at a safe working angle. The horizontal distance of the top support to the foot of the ladder was greater than one quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2716
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342371549.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.