Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: COMPLETE TANK, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COMPLETE TANK, LLC in 453 PEPPER STREET, MONROE, CT 06468 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342377546.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Complete Tank, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Complete Tank, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COMPLETE TANK, LLC
Site address
453 PEPPER STREET
City
MONROE
State
CT
ZIP
06468
Mailing
87 SAXONY DRIVE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
1
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  JOBSITE:  The employee operating a Makita circular saw to cut wood was not provided with eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1521.1
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites.   JOBSITE:  The employer did not use either a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) or an assured equipment grounding program with the use of an electrical Makita circular saw to cut wood.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1521.1
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:  JOBSITE:  The attachment plug of the yellow/black extension cord used to power a Makita circular saw was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7): Slip resistant feet were used as a substitute for care in placing, lashing, or holding a ladder that is used upon slippery surfaces, including, but not limited to, flat metal or concrete surfaces that are constructed so they cannot be prevented from becoming slippery.  JOBSITE:  The Werner 32-foot extension ladder, used to gain access to an upper level was placed on slippery concrete floor surface without appropriately secured and/or lashed to prevent from displacement.  On or about 06/05/17, the above ladder was displaced while an was working from the ladder, and the employee sustained a dislocated left elbow and fractures of the bones surrounding his left elbow from the incident.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2662.1
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  JOBSITE:  The employee required to use a Werner 32-foot extension ladder to gain access to an upper level was not provided with training for proper handling and use of ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342377546.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.