Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: 5N PLUS WISCONSIN, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of 5N PLUS WISCONSIN, INC in 120 CORPORATE DRIVE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 342378106.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 5N Plus Wisconsin, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 5N Plus Wisconsin, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 CORPORATE DRIVE
City
TRUMBULL
State
CT
ZIP
06611
Mailing
120 CORPORATE DRIVE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,390 Reduced

Hazardous substances SLT3

29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    Warehouse: The employer did not develop and implement an emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1390
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Abate by
Sep 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,870 Reduced

Hazardous substances SLT3

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    Warehouse:  The employee who was voluntarily using a tight fitting half face air-purifying respirator was not provide with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1870
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,240 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2330SLT3

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    Warehouse:  The company did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards to that the employees were exposed when they were offloading shipping containers leaking hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3240
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.1027 L07 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Abate by
Sep 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2330SLT3

29 CFR 1910.1027(l)(7)(i): The employer did not provide a medical examination, as soon as possible, to any employee who could have been acutely exposed to cadmium because of an emergency in addition to the medical surveillance required by 29 CFR 1910.1027(l)(2) through 1910.1027(l)(6):    Warehouse: The employer did not provide for a medical evaluation to the employees that were exposed to the Unrefined Semiconductor Material release.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Abate by
Sep 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,870 Reduced

Hazardous substances SLT3

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    Warehouse:  The employer did not establish and implement elements of a respiratory protection program to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use did not present a health hazard to the user.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1870
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.1027 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,240 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2330SLT3

29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i): The employer did not determine whether any employee was exposed to cadmium at or above the action level:    Warehouse:  The employer did not evaluate and determine if any employee was exposed to cadmium during offloading containers leaking compounds at/or above action level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3240
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Abate by
Sep 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,390 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met.    Warehouse: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program, including the Globalized Harmonized System where employees were required to handle and work with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1390
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Abate by
Sep 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.    Warehouse: The employees, required to handle and work with hazardous chemicals were not provided with training and information in the chemical hazard communications, including the Globalized Harmonized System.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342378106.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.