SCHULENBURG, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SCHULENBURG PRINTING & OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHULENBURG PRINTING & OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. in 705 UPTON AVENUE, SCHULENBURG, TX 78956 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 342380458.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCHULENBURG PRINTING & OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
- Site address
- 705 UPTON AVENUE
- City
- SCHULENBURG
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78956
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 429, SCHULENBURG, TX 78956
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years. On or about 7 June 2017, and at times prior thereto, employees were allowed to operate a Clark forklift without having been evaluated at least once every three years, exposing the operator and those nearby to the hazard of being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1303.8
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). On or about 7 June 2017, and at times prior thereto, employees were allowed to operate a Clark forklift without having successfully completed a powered industrial truck training and evaluation program, exposing the operator and those nearby to the hazard of being struck by the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,847 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. On or about 7 June 2017, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain a current list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present at the work site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108.2
- · Z (S) $1847
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical. On or about 7 June 2017, and at times prior thereto, various hand-held dispensing bottles within the shop floor contained flammable liquids that were not labeled to the contents or hazard of the chemicals, exposing the employees using them to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical. On or about 7 June 2017, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $724 · Current $434 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use either an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. On or about 7 June 2017, the employer did not use the OSHA 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses or an equivalent form. Also, the employer was utilizing a Worker's Compensation Employer's First Report of Injury form instead of the OSHA 301 Injury and Illness Incident Report that did not have all the fields necessary to be an equivalent form.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $434.4
- · Z (O) $724
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation. On or about 7 June 2017, the employer did not complete the OSHA 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses in the detail as required by the regulation. 1) For calendar years 2014, 2016 and 2017, Column F, which requires a description of the injury or illness, parts of body affected, and the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill, was missing the specific injury for each case that was recorded. 2) Calendar year 2014 had one case recorded which did not have the classification of the case marked. 3) Calendar year 2016 had one case classified as Days Away from Work, but did not have the number of days away from work in Column L.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342380458.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.