STOUGHTON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: MARIA ROOFING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIA ROOFING LLC in 1209 E. MAIN ST., STOUGHTON, WI 53589 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342381860.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIA ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 1209 E. MAIN ST.
- City
- STOUGHTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53589
- Mailing
- 342 HIGHLAND DR. #7, MADISON, WI 53705
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violation that was issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was being used when working from the roof of a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) The employer did not ensure that ladders used for access were at least 3 feet above the landing surface, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2173
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342381860.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.