Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: 98 CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 98 CONSTRUCTION INC. in 70 EAST BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10002 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 342389368.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 98 Construction INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 98 Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
70 EAST BROADWAY
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10002
Mailing
44 MONROE STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10002
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.59

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1926.59: 29 CFR 1926.59:  An employer engaged in construction activities did not comply with the requirements set forth in Part 1910, Section 1200, Hazard Communication:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Employees were working with chemicals without having been HAZCOM trained and without having SDS's available upon request.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1630

1926.403 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Safety of equipment was not determined on the basis of suitability of the equipment for an identified purpose as evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose.  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Inside the elevator, a quad outlet box was hanging from the power cord, secured with tape, and not secured to a solid surface.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.403 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph:   a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  In the basement, inside the service panel, no cover was in place exposing workers to contact live electrical circuits.    b)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  In the stairwell, multiple lighting fixtures hung by their wires, with contacts exposed and with open junction boxes, exposing workers to contact with live electrical circuits.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Workers use a variety of power tools and supplied electrical power throughout the building without GFI protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Inside the elevator shaft pit, employees used a 4 foot step ladder placed against the wall of the pit to enter and exit, where the top level of the ladder was flush with the upper floor surface and did not extend at least 3 feet above this landing.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:(a)  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Inside the elevator shaft pit, employees used a 4 foot step ladder placed against the wall of the pit to enter and exit, and not opened with the spreaders locked as it is designed to be used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 6/6/17:  Inside the elevator shaft pit, employees used a 4 foot step ladder placed against the wall of the pit to enter and exit, requiring to step onto and off of the top of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View 98 Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342389368.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.