Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 8 POINT CONSTRUCTION JD, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 8 POINT CONSTRUCTION JD, LLC in 1009 S. MOORELAND RD., BROOKFIELD, WI 53008 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342391034.

Watch 8 Point Construction JD, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 8 Point Construction JD, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1009 S. MOORELAND RD.
City
BROOKFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53008
Mailing
5800 CAMAS PRAIRIE TRAIL, LAUREL, MT 59044
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a)  The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violation that was issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Abate by
Aug 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,173 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    (a) The employer did not ensure that a program was implemented that required worksite inspections of hazards such as, but not limited to, fall hazards, electrical hazards, struck-by hazards and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2172.8
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were not using the guardrails of a aerial lift platform to work from.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working from the platform of an aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042.4
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342391034.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.