BROOKFIELD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: 8 POINT CONSTRUCTION JD, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 8 POINT CONSTRUCTION JD, LLC in 1009 S. MOORELAND RD., BROOKFIELD, WI 53008 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342391034.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 8 POINT CONSTRUCTION JD, LLC
- Site address
- 1009 S. MOORELAND RD.
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53008
- Mailing
- 5800 CAMAS PRAIRIE TRAIL, LAUREL, MT 59044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violation that was issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer did not ensure that a program was implemented that required worksite inspections of hazards such as, but not limited to, fall hazards, electrical hazards, struck-by hazards and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2172.8
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.453 B02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were not using the guardrails of a aerial lift platform to work from.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,042 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working from the platform of an aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3042.4
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342391034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.