STRATFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: KINGS PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KINGS PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC in 82 SHERIDAN STREET, STRATFORD, CT 06615 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342394335.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINGS PAINTING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
- Site address
- 82 SHERIDAN STREET
- City
- STRATFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06615
- Mailing
- 699 CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 1, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06608
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were re-roofing the 10 in 12 high pitch residential roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the 10 in 12 high roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342394335.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.