Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TATRA RENOVATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TATRA RENOVATION, INC. in 320 WEST 101ST ST., NEW YORK, NY 10025 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342395001.

Watch Tatra Renovation, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tatra Renovation, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 WEST 101ST ST.
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10025
Mailing
5815 58TH ROAD, MASPETH, NY 11378
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5070.00 · Current $3900.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:      a) Building backyard:      Employees were dismantling a 5-story-high supported scaffold. The scaffold platforms which employees were on while dismantling were not at least 18 inches wide. On or about 06/12/17.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3900
  • — Z (S) $5070

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5070.00 · Current $3700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds shall be erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration. Such activities shall be performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.      a) Building backyard:      Employees were dismantling a 5-story-high supported scaffold. The scaffold was not dismantled under the supervision and direction of a competent person. Employees who dismantled the scaffold were exposed to hazards, including but not limited to: fall hazard due to no competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection, and working on scaffold platforms that are not at least 18 inches wide. The employer did not have a competent person on site for the scaffold dismantling. On or about 06/12/17.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3700
  • — Z (S) $5070

1926.451 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds:    a) Building backyard:    Employees were dismantling a 5-story-high supported scaffold. The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees dismantling the supported scaffold. On or about 06/12/17.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3622.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.      a) Building backyard:      Employees were dismantling a 5-story-high supported scaffold. The employer did not have each employee involved in dismantling scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize hazards associated with scaffold dismantling. On or about 06/12/17.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3622

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342395001.