WATERBURY, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: LEODAN ROBLERO
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LEODAN ROBLERO in 1477 BALDWIN ST., WATERBURY, CT 06706 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342395092.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEODAN ROBLERO
- Site address
- 1477 BALDWIN ST.
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06706
- Mailing
- 468 LOMBARD ST., NEW HAVEN, CT 06513
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $2,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that roof debris with protruding nails was removed from the employee's working/walking areas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2260
- · Z (S) $3259
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that roof debris with protruding nails was removed from the area around the bottom of the ladder that was used by employees to gain access to the roof on which they were working.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,660 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were engaged in residential construction activities on the roof were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2660
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the residential roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use. Worksite: The employer did not ensure the aluminum extension ladder that was used by employees to gain access to the residential roof was safe for use through inspecting by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1880
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342395092.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.