Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KOSTER KEUNEN, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KOSTER KEUNEN, LLC in 1021 ECHO LAKE ROAD, WATERTOWN, CT 06795 (NAICS 325612). OSHA activity number 342397296.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Koster Keunen, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Koster Keunen, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KOSTER KEUNEN, LLC
Site address
1021 ECHO LAKE ROAD
City
WATERTOWN
State
CT
ZIP
06795
Mailing
P.O. BOX 69, WATERTOWN, CT 06795
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325612
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    Various Departments where wax is heated;    On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not require face protection to be worn where employees are exposed to the potential splashing of hot wax when solid materials are being added to the process tanks.  There have been employee injuries that resulted from the splashing of hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $7605
  • — Z (S) $7605

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.    Various departments where employees add solids to hot wax;      On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not ensure that the appropriate hand/arm protection was worn where employees are exposed to the potential splashing of hot wax when solid materials are being added to the process tanks.  There have been employee injuries that resulted from the splashing of hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Bleaching Department;    On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not establish a respiratory protection program for employees working in the bleaching department who were required to wear N95 masks when adding solid powder materials, such as activated carbon and an organic peroxide, to the hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $5070
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    Bleaching Department;    On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees working in the bleaching department who were required to wear N95 masks when adding solid powder materials, such as activated carbon and an organic peroxide, to the hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    Bleaching Department;    On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not a fit test to employees working in the bleaching department who were required to wear N95 masks when adding solid powder materials, such as activated carbon and an organic peroxide, to the hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Feb 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):    Bleaching Department;    On or about 6/14/17, the employer did not provide respirator training to employees working in the bleaching department who were required to wear N95 masks when adding solid powder materials, such as activated carbon and an organic peroxide, to the hot wax.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Koster Keunen, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342397296.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.