EDWARDSVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JOHN GILES DBA GILES CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOHN GILES DBA GILES CONSTRUCTION in 7064 ALSTON CT., EDWARDSVILLE, IL 62025 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342399169.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOHN GILES DBA GILES CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 7064 ALSTON CT.
- City
- EDWARDSVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62025
- Mailing
- 1039 SUMNER STREET, CARLINVILLE, IL 62626
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 9/6/2017, the employer did not certify complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 9/6/2017, the employer did not certify complete abatement of the cited violation. c) For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017, the employer did not certify complete abatement of the cited violation. d) For Citation 1, Item 5, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 9/28/2017, the employer did not certify complete abatement of the cited violation. e) For Citation 1, Item 7, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 9/28/2017, the employer did not certify complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 3a, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017 the employer did not provide documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017 the employer did not provide documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. c) For Citation 1, Item 4a, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017 the employer did not provide documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. d) For Citation 1, Item 4b, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017 the employer did not provide documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. e) For Citation 1, Item 6, issued on 7/20/2017 with an abatement date of 8/16/2017 the employer did not provide documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights and struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2716
- — I (S) $4617
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to the hazard of falling and being struck by materials during roofing operations.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2716
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns to perform roof installation operations.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2173
- — I (S) $1847
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately eighteen (18) feet off the roof eve when they were performing roofing operations.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3803
- — I (S) $5541
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.502 D
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d): "Personal fall arrest systems." Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system: The employer did not ensure that body belts were not used after January 1, 1998 as part of personal fall arrest systems when employees were performing roofing operations and exposed to an eighteen (18) foot fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D06 III
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(iii): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any objectwhich is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself. The employer did not ensure that a snaphook, used on a personal fall arrest system, was not connected to an anchor Dee-ring which had another snaphook connected to it.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3803
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee: The employer did not ensure fall protection anchor points were installed to support at least 5,000 pounds for employees who were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately eighteen (18) feet while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2716
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: The employer did not provide fall protection training to enable employees to recognize and control the fall hazards at their worksite while performing residential construction. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately eighteen (18) foot.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2716
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access: The employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing. Workers performing residential construction were exposed to falling approximately twelve (12) feet while using an extension ladder to ascend/descend from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3803
- — I (S) $3232
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: The employer did not train the employees to properly construct and place a ladder so it was extended thirty-six (36) inches or approximately 3 rugs above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2716
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at John Giles DBA Giles Construction
View John Giles DBA Giles Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342399169.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.