RIVERSIDE, RI ·
OSHA Inspection: THE APIARY, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE APIARY, LLC in 332 BULLOCKS POINT AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, RI 02915 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342402963.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE APIARY, LLC
- Site address
- 332 BULLOCKS POINT AVENUE
- City
- RIVERSIDE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02915
- Mailing
- 64 CHANNING AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, RI 02915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Worksite: On or about 6/16/2017, eye and face protective equipment was not used when employees were operating pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.451 A01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Each scaffold and/or scaffold component was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it: (a) Worksite: On or about 6/16/2017, the employer did not ensure that the erected ladder-jack scaffold was capable of supporting at least 4 times the maximum intended load due to the following: The distance between supports was twenty-one feet, exceeding the eight foot limit, and one of the support ladders was Type III, designed for household use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: (a) Worksite: On or about 6/16/2017, an employee was exposed to falling while ascending an extension ladder and carrying a box of exterior siding shingles over his shoulder which could cause the employee to lose his balance and fall.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342402963.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.