Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: AMIGO MASONRY SERVICES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMIGO MASONRY SERVICES, INC. in 3034 LAWRENCEVILLE SUWANEE RD NW, SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342413184.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Amigo Masonry Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amigo Masonry Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3034 LAWRENCEVILLE SUWANEE RD NW
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
3095 BRIAR OAK DR., DULUTH, GA 30096
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 10 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  1. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 1 issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    2. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    3. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    4. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.     5. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    6. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-c issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    7. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-d issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    8. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-e issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    9. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 6-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    10. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 6-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 10 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  1. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 1 issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    2. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    3. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    4. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.     5. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    6. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-c issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    7. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-d issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    8. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 4-e issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    9. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 6-a issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.    10. On or about 2/26/2019, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 6-b issued on 9/27/2017 with an abatement due date of 10/16/2018.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1926.25 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:     On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) The employer did not ensure the area around the scaffold was free of debris, exposing employees to tripping hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $891 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    (a) Employees engaged in work related to masonry inside the building were exposed to struck by hazards while working beneath a scaffold where other employees were working in that no hard hats were worn.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $891
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    (a)  Employees engaged in masonry working beneath a scaffold inside the building were exposed to being struck by flying particles while chipping and breaking brick with no safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $891 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    (a) Where employees were performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding, the employer did not ensure the scaffold was fully planked on the second working level, exposing employees to a fall of 13' and 1'' to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $891
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) Employees were performing masonry work from a scaffold. Employees climbed the end frames, exposing employees to falls from heights of up to 13'-1'' to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01 VI

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vi): Each employee performing overhand bricklaying operations from a supported scaffold was not protected from falling from all open sides and ends of the scaffold (except at the side next to the wall being laid) by the use of a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity):    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) Employer did not install a proper guardrail system on the second deck of the scaffold or use a personal fall arrest system to protect employees from falling to the lower level. Employees were exposed to falling 13' and 1'' to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) The employer did not ensure that toeboards were installed on the scaffold exposing employees underneath to stuck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.452 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(4): End frames of tubular welded frame scaffolding were not locked together vertically by use of pins or equivalent means in areas where uplift could occur:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) Employees performing masonry work from a fabricated frame scaffold three buck high. The employer did not ensure that metal pins were installed to prevent scaffold collapse.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $891 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) Employees performing masonry worked from a fabricated frame scaffold. The employer did not ensure that the scaffold inside the building was inspected by a competent person and free from defects and hazards, such as but not limited to missing guardrails, ladder, pins, and working levels that were not fully planked. Employees were exposed to falls from heights up to 13'-1'' to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $891
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) Employees were performing masonry work from a scaffold inside the building and the employer did not ensure that it was erected by a person that had proficient knowledge and could identify potential defects or hazards, exposing employees to falls from heights of  13'-1'' to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes by covers.    On or about June 21, 2017 at 3034 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, GA 30034:    a) The employer did not ensure that a hole approximately 2' feet deep located in the work area inside the building was covered. The hole was filled with water exposing employees performing masonry work to trip, fall and drowning hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342413184.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.