OSHA Inspection: DANIEL MOYA DBA DNE RESTORATION LLC

Issued

2018-02-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-03-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Daniel Moya dba DNE Restoration LLC., failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:   Citation Number            Item Number                    Abatement Date  01                                01                                   01/25/2018  01                                02a                                   12/27/2017  01                                02b                                  12/27/2017  01                                03a                                    12/27/2017  01                                03b                                    12/27/2017  01                                04                                        12/27/2017  01                                05a                                    12/27/2017  01                                05b                                    12/27/2017  01                                05c                                      12/27/2017  02                                01                                        12/27/2017  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-01-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): Program(s) were not initiated and/or maintained to comply with applicable safety and health provisions:   a) On or about June 22, 2017, the employer did not maintain programs to provide for compliance with the OSH Act to control or minimize the safety and health hazards associated with masonry work that his employees are required to perform.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(vi): The outrigger beams which should be stabilized by bolts or other direct connections to the floor or roof deck were not secured by tiebacks:  a)  On June 22, 2017, the two point suspension scaffolding that the employer provided did not have the outrigger beams secured by tiebacks.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(d)(4)(i): Suspension scaffold outrigger beams were not provided with stop bolts or shackles at both ends:   a)  On June 22, 2017, on the west side of the building, the employer provided for employee use two point suspension scaffolding that was not equipped with a stop bolt or shackle at the end of the outrigger beams.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(d)(16): Suspension scaffold power-operated hoists or manually operated hoists did not have a braking device or locking pawl which engages automatically when a hoist makes either of the following uncontrolled movements: an instantaneous change in momentum or an accelerated over-speed:    a)  On June, 22, 2017, the employer provided for employee use on the east side of the building, a two-point suspension scaffold which did not have a braking device or locking pawl.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(d)(17): Manually operated hoists did not have a positive crank force to descend:    a)  On June 22, 2017, the employer provided for employee use on the east side of the building, a two-point suspension scaffold where the manually operated hoist did not have a positive crank force to descend.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:  a)  On June 22, 2017, the employer provided a, two-point suspension scaffolds for employee use where the employees were not protected by a personal fall arrest system.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Verical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffoldk, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion:  a)  On June 22, 2017, the employer provided for employee use vertical life lines for two, two-point suspension scaffolds that were not protected from abrasion when placed over the side/ edge of the roof to the scaffolding below.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv):  Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes shall not be attached to each other, nor shall they be attached to or use the same point of anchorage, nor shall they be attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system:    a)  On June 22, 2017, the employer provided for employee use vertical lifelines for a two-point suspension scaffold located on the east side of the building that was attached to ropes being used as suspension scaffold tiebacks.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iii): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, solid panels or equivalent structural members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the scaffold platform:    a) On June 22, 2017, employees were performing masonry from a scaffold platform located on the east side of the building were there were no midrails or equivalent members were installed.

Issued

2017-12-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(d)(5)(ii): Suspension scaffold support devices such as cornice hooks, roof hooks, roof irons, parapet clamps, or similar devices were not supported by bearing blocks:  a)  On June 22, 2017, employees were working from the east two point suspension scaffold where the right and left cornice hooks were not supported by bearing blocks.