SUFFERN, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN FURNITURE CO.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN FURNITURE CO. in 30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE, SUFFERN, NY 10901 (NAICS 423210). OSHA activity number 342421856.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN FURNITURE CO.
- Site address
- 30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE
- City
- SUFFERN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10901
- Mailing
- 30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE, SUFFERN, NY 10901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423210
- Employees
- 320
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,157 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) Furniture Restoration Areas: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were not required to wear appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 6/19/17. b) Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans (e.g., Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Mohawk Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Leather Repair Basecoat [methyl ethyl ketone] were not required to wear appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17. c) Upholstery Repair Room: An employee using a Numax Upholstery Stapler was not required to wear eye protection; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $4000
- · Z (S) $6157
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,617 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer: a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and the employer did not implement a written respiratory program with worksite specific procedures; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4617
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and were not provided a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to safely use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and the employer did not provide fit testing prior to initial use; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 H03 I A
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(i)(A): Respirators used in routine situations were not inspected before each use and during cleaning: a) Production Area - Powder Spray Coating Operation: Employees spraying samples of powder spray coating were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14. b) Production Area - Raw Ingredient Weighing Areas: Employees weighing out raw materials in these areas were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14. c) Production Area- Production Lines: Employees bagging finished powder-coating products were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,617 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes. a) Furniture Restoration Areas: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were not required to wear appropriate hand protection (e.g., chemical resistant gloves or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17. b) Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans (e.g., Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Mohawk Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Leather Repair Basecoat [methyl ethyl ketone] were not required to wear appropriate hand protection (e.g., chemical resistant gloves or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $2000
- · Z (S) $4617
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423210)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342421856.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.