Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN FURNITURE CO.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAYMOUR & FLANIGAN FURNITURE CO. in 30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE, SUFFERN, NY 10901 (NAICS 423210). OSHA activity number 342421856.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Raymour & Flanigan Furniture CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Raymour & Flanigan Furniture CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE
City
SUFFERN
State
NY
ZIP
10901
Mailing
30 DUNNIGAN DRIVE, SUFFERN, NY 10901
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423210
Employees
320
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,157 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) Furniture Restoration Areas:    Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol,  n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were not required to wear appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 6/19/17.    b) Spray Room:  Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans (e.g., Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol,  n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Mohawk Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Leather Repair Basecoat [methyl ethyl ketone] were not required to wear appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17.    c) Upholstery Repair Room:  An employee using a Numax Upholstery Stapler was not required to wear eye protection; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $4000
  • · Z (S) $6157

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,617 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:  a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room:    Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and the employer did not implement a written respiratory program with worksite specific procedures; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4617

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room:  Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol,  n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and were not provided a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to safely use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) Furniture Restoration Areas/Spray Room: Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol,  n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were required to wear half face air purifying respirators and the employer did not provide fit testing prior to initial use; on or about 6/19/17.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 H03 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(i)(A): Respirators used in routine situations were not inspected before each use and during cleaning:  a) Production Area - Powder Spray Coating Operation: Employees spraying samples of powder spray coating were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14.  b) Production Area - Raw Ingredient Weighing Areas: Employees weighing out raw materials in these areas were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14.  c) Production Area- Production Lines:  Employees bagging finished powder-coating products were required to use respirators (N95 dust masks or half-face air purifying respirators) and the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected prior to use; on or about 10/7/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,617 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes.    a) Furniture Restoration Areas:    Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans including but not limited to Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], etc. were not required to wear appropriate hand protection (e.g., chemical resistant gloves or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17.    b) Spray Room:  Employees spraying solvent-based chemicals from aerosol cans (e.g., Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Finish Sealer [isopropanol, n-butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Pre-Catalyzed Clear Lacquer [n-butyl acetate, butanol], Mohawk Tone Finish Toner [acetone, isobutyl acetate], Mohawk Leather Repair Basecoat [methyl ethyl ketone] were not required to wear appropriate hand protection (e.g., chemical resistant gloves or equivalent); on or about 9/12/17.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2000
  • · Z (S) $4617

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342421856.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.