Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: NATHAN POPOLOSKI

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NATHAN POPOLOSKI in 106 POWDER POINT AVENUE, DUXBURY, MA 02331 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342423415.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nathan Popoloski for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nathan Popoloski is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NATHAN POPOLOSKI
Site address
106 POWDER POINT AVENUE
City
DUXBURY
State
MA
ZIP
02331
Mailing
PO BOX 1964, DUXBURY, MA 02331
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     (a)  Jobsite:  Employees were installing roofing shingles on a steep pitched roof without the use of fall protection exposing them to a fall of approximately twenty-five (25) feet from the roof peak to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1900
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a)  Jobsite:  Employees were installing roofing shingles on a steep pitched roof where the employees were not trained in the use of fall protection, the recognition of fall hazards, and how to minimize the fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2017
Abate by
Aug 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:     (a) Jobsite:  Two aluminum extension ladders were used at an angle that is less than the required safe angle exposing employees to falls from the ladder while ascending or descending.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1350
  • · Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342423415.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.