Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL DATA COMPANY INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GENERAL DATA COMPANY INC. in 4043 MCMANN ROAD, CINCINNATI, OH 45245 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 342425857.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Data Company INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Data Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4043 MCMANN ROAD
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45245
Mailing
4354 FERGUSON DRIVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45245
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
31
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2017
Abate by
Aug 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $3,463 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):    a) The procedures which were developed by the employer for the Press 15 Turret failed to identify the pneumatic energy source.     b) The procedures which were developed by the employer for the Press 16 Turret failed to identify the pneumatic energy source.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3463
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2017
Abate by
Aug 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    Press operators and maintenance employees conduct servicing and maintenance on presses, such as applying tape to spindles, and the employer did not ensure that they received training on the energy control program in that press operators did not receive training for authorized employees and maintenance employees were not trained on energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    Employees who performed taping on and around the press spindle turrets were not required to:  (1) Know the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy,  (2) turn off and shut down the machines,  (3) physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,   (4) affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device,  (5) prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.     Employees required to rely on electronic control components were exposed to crushing hazards from the energized Press 15 spindle turret and the Press 16 spindle turret.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a.) On or about June 19th,2017, on the turret of press 15, employees removed rolls from spindles and placed cores on spindles and the employer did not ensure that a guard was provided over the core ejector to prevent employee contact during spindle turret rotation.    b.) On or about June 19th,2017, on the turret of press 16, employees removed rolls from spindles and placed cores on spindles and the employer did not ensure that a guard was provided over the core ejector to prevent employee contact during spindle turret rotation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6926

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $3,463 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four hours.     The employer did not report an employee hospitalization which occurred on June 19th, 2017 to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3463
  • — Z (O) $6926

View General Data Company INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342425857.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.