Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JERRY LIPTAK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JERRY LIPTAK in 3970 ROUTE 30, LATROBE, PA 15650 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342426285.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jerry Liptak — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jerry Liptak is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JERRY LIPTAK
Site address
3970 ROUTE 30
City
LATROBE
State
PA
ZIP
15650
Mailing
773 DRY RUN ROAD, MONONGAHELA, PA 15063
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met:       a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program existed where employees used chemicals such as Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial DTM Acrylic Coating and STO primer adhesive-B 80101 .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $815
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s):    a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were available for chemicals used in the workplace such as Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial DTM Acrylic Coating and STO primer adhesive-B 80101.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area:   a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees were given effective training on chemicals they worked with such as Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial DTM Acrylic Coating and STO primer adhesive-B 80101.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:      a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used electrical equipment in accordance with labeling provisions in that a relocatable power tap was used outdoors when it was labeled for indoor use only.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $815
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from damage, sharp corners and projections were not avoided or flexible cords and cables were allowed to pass through doorways or other pinch points, where protection was not provided to avoid damage:  Instances including but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities at the rear of the building, the employer did not ensure that an extension cord running through a doorway was properly protected from damage in that a wooden triangular shape door prop was not kept consistently in place to prevent the door from closing on the cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were permitted to be used:   Instances including but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that an extension cord used in the rear of the building was in good repair in that it had a cut through the outer jacket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,270 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:      a) Job site, 3970 Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that employees wore appropriate fall protection systems/devices while working in an aerial lift.     Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1270
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2017
Abate by
Aug 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:   a) Job site, 3970 State Route 30, Latrobe, PA: On or about June 22, 2017, during painting activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate safety and health practices were in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jerry Liptak's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342426285.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.