SANDPOINT, ID ·
OSHA Inspection: SAND-IDA SERVICES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SAND-IDA SERVICES, INC. in 807 N 5TH AVENUE, SANDPOINT, ID 83864 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 342426459.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAND-IDA SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 807 N 5TH AVENUE
- City
- SANDPOINT
- State
- ID
- ZIP
- 83864
- Mailing
- POB 128, SANDPOINT, ID 83864
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $3,549 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(ii): Trained persons did not operate an aerial lift: (a) On or about June 21, 2017, and at times prior thereto, an employee working out of a Bil-Jax aerial lift without use of a body harness and/or restraining belt with a lanyard attached to the boom or bucket, demonstrated a lack of understanding , skills and/or knowledge necessary to operate the aerial lift before using it on the job. Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3549
- · Z (S) $5070
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A personal fall arrest or travel restraint system that meets the requirements in 29 CFR part 1910, subpart I, was not worn and attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. (a) On or about June 21, 2017, and at times prior, an employee did not don a personal fall arrest system and was exposed to a potential fall hazard. Note: Corrected during Inspection
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.333 B02
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $4,437 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): "Lockout and Tagging." While any employee is exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which have been deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph. The requirements were not followed in the order in which they are presented (i.e., paragraph (b)(2)(i) first, then paragraph (b)(2)(ii), etc.). Note 1: As used in this section, fixed equipment refers to equipment fastened in place or connected by permanent wiring methods. Note 2: Lockout and tagging procedures that comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of 1910.147 will also be deemed to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section provided that: [1] The procedures address the electrical safety hazards covered by this Subpart; and [2] The procedures also incorporate the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(D) and (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. (A) Circuits energizing parts were not locked out or tagged or both as required. a) On or about June 21, 2017, and at times prior, the employer did not establish program/procedures to properly control the potential hazardous energy. An employee upgrading the current light system to LED was exposed to the potential unexpected startup and/or release of stored energy. Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4436.6
- · Z (S) $6338
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment. (a) On or about June 21, 2017, and at times prior thereto, an employee utilizing portable power tools while replacing the lighting to LED and did not have safety glasses. CORRECTED DURING INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in ID
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342426459.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.