Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: D & D PLUNGER & MACHINE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of D & D PLUNGER & MACHINE, INC. in 2713 W. 81ST STREET, ODESSA, TX 79765 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 342426640.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D & D Plunger & Machine, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D & D Plunger & Machine, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2713 W. 81ST STREET
City
ODESSA
State
TX
ZIP
79765
Mailing
P.O. BOX 13691, ODESSA, TX 79768
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    Employer did not ensure walking/working surfaces were free from flexible cords exposed employees to slips and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1086.5
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    Employer did not ensure that an exit was not obstructed by a fan on a 5 gallon bucket exposed employees to fire and smoke inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1086.5
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    Employer did not ensure each exit door had an "EXIT" sign posted on or above the door exposed employees to fire and smoke inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person which certified that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    Employer did not ensure that a written workplace hazard assessment to determine the need for personal protective equipment had been performed for employees required to nickel coat and grind parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1811
  • · Z (S) $3622

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,449 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    Employer did not ensure fire extinguishers throughout the machine shop were mounted exposed employees to fire and smoke inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1448.5
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:    Employer did not ensure employees were trained in forklift operation exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1811
  • · Z (S) $3622

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating a defective powered industrial truck that had not been taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:    Employer did not conduct monthly hook inspections with certification records for employees exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2535
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  Employer did not conduct monthly chain inspections with a certification records for overhead cranes exposed to struck-by hazards.        a) 2-1 ton Harrington overhead cranes located south east of the shop.      b) 2-1 ton overhead cranes located in the middle of the shop.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 L03 III

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii): Repairs or replacements were not provided promptly as needed for safe operation of crane(s):    Employer did not ensure overhead cranes hooks were replaced promptly as needed for safe operation of the overhead cranes.         a) 1-ton overhead crane located on the south east end of the shop.        b) 1-ton overhead crane located on the south east end of the shop.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2535
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.184 H05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(h)(5)(i): Natural or synthetic fiber rope sling(s) with abnormal wear were not immediately removed from service:    The employer did not ensure a defective natural or synthetic sling was taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,449 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    Employer did not ensure flexible cords used to supply current to fans in the work area outer insulation was not damage exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1448.5
  • · Z (S) $2897

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Employer did not ensure employees required to work with nickel and silica were provide information and training on the hazards of the chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2535
  • · Z (S) $5070

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342426640.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.