Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JADE SERVICES INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JADE SERVICES INC. in BURKHART #1, LAMESA, TX 79331 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 342426699.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jade Services INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jade Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JADE SERVICES INC.
Site address
BURKHART #1
City
LAMESA
State
TX
ZIP
79331
Mailing
PO BOX 303, LAMESA, TX 79331
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Employees engaged in performing well servicing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of four feet from not having standard railing on the open sides of the stairs that accessed the service rig platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,847 · Current $1,108 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids and chemical glasses.    Employees engaged in performing well servicing operations on the blow out preventer were exposed to struck by hazards from not having eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.2
  • — Z (S) $1847

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.    Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to explosion and fire hazards from not having fire extinguishers at the well site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,041 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv).      Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to asphyxiation hazards from not being provided H2S training prior to performing work in the oil field environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2040.6
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.134 H03 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $406 · Current $244 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(iii): Self-contained breathing apparatus were not inspected monthly, maintained in a fully charged state, recharged when the pressure falls to 90% and the employer did not determine that the regulator and warning devices function properly:.    Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to inhalation and asphyxiation hazards form not having monthly inspecitons of SCBA units performed prior to beginning operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $243.6
  • — Z (O) $406

1910.134 I04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(4)(i): Cylinders used to supply breathing air to respirators were not tested and maintained as prescribed in the shipping container specification regulations of the Department of Transportation (49 CFR part 173 and part 178).   Employees engaged in well service operations were utilizing Scott SCBA emergency escape cylinders with expired hydrostatic testing dates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jade Services INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342426699.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.