LAMESA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JADE SERVICES INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JADE SERVICES INC. in BURKHART #1, LAMESA, TX 79331 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 342426699.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JADE SERVICES INC.
- Site address
- BURKHART #1
- City
- LAMESA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79331
- Mailing
- PO BOX 303, LAMESA, TX 79331
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Employees engaged in performing well servicing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of four feet from not having standard railing on the open sides of the stairs that accessed the service rig platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,847 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids and chemical glasses. Employees engaged in performing well servicing operations on the blow out preventer were exposed to struck by hazards from not having eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1108.2
- — Z (S) $1847
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries. Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to explosion and fire hazards from not having fire extinguishers at the well site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,041 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv). Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to asphyxiation hazards from not being provided H2S training prior to performing work in the oil field environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2040.6
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.134 H03 III
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $406 · Current $244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(iii): Self-contained breathing apparatus were not inspected monthly, maintained in a fully charged state, recharged when the pressure falls to 90% and the employer did not determine that the regulator and warning devices function properly:. Employees engaged in well servicing operations were exposed to inhalation and asphyxiation hazards form not having monthly inspecitons of SCBA units performed prior to beginning operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $243.6
- — Z (O) $406
1910.134 I04 I
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(4)(i): Cylinders used to supply breathing air to respirators were not tested and maintained as prescribed in the shipping container specification regulations of the Department of Transportation (49 CFR part 173 and part 178). Employees engaged in well service operations were utilizing Scott SCBA emergency escape cylinders with expired hydrostatic testing dates.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Jade Services INC.
View Jade Services INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342426699.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.