OSHA Inspection: MARCO AGUILAR

Issued

2017-10-05 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a)  On or about October 2, 2017; verification and abatement:  The employer failed to provide verification of abatement for citation 1, item number 1from inspection 1242671 which was issued on July 6, 2017 and had a final contest date of August 2, 2017.  b)  On or about October 2, 2017; verification and abatement:  The employer failed to provide verification of abatement for citation 1, item number 2 from inspection 1242671 which was issued on July 6, 2017 and had a final contest date of August 2, 2017.

Issued

2017-07-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3259.00 · Current $3259.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  At Lot 59 Lodgepole Ct. Savannah Woods, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about June 26, 2017 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing and roofing activities from a high slope roof without fall protection exposing them to a fall hazard of 13.1 feet to the ground below.  b)  At Lot 59 Lodgepole Ct. Savannah Woods, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about June 26, 2017 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to walk the tops of ceiling joists without fall protection exposing them to a fall hazard of up to 9 feet to the floor below.

Issued

2017-07-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2173.00 · Current $2173.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a)  At Rear of House Lot 59 Lodgepole Ct. Savannah Woods, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about June 26, 2017 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use the top step of step ladder to gain access to the roof top exposing them to a fall hazard of 13.1 feet to the ground below.  b)  At 59 Lodgepole Ct. Savannah Woods, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about June 26, 2017 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use the top step of step ladder to gain access to the top of ceiling joists exposing them to a fall hazard of up to 9 feet to the floor below.