ARKADELPHIA, AR —
OSHA Inspection: DANFOSS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DANFOSS in 1 SCROLL DRIVE, ARKADELPHIA, AR 71923 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 342429503.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANFOSS
- Site address
- 1 SCROLL DRIVE
- City
- ARKADELPHIA
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 71923
- Mailing
- 1 SCROLL DRIVE CLARK COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, ARKADELPHIA, AR 71923
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333415
- Employees
- 187
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5432.00 · Current $2800.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: For the employees working in the High Speed Machine Area, Cell Fabrication Area, Assembly Production Area, and Ransohoff Machine Area on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not provide employees annual audiometric testing as part of an effective hearing conservation program. Department Dose% dbA TWA Equivalent Time Sampled High Speed Machining 92.0 87.4 370 Min Ransohoff Machine 78.0 86.2 477 Min Assembly Production 74.4 85.9 485 Min Shell Fabrication 142.8 90.6 475 Min Note* TWA Equivalent factors in the +/- 2 decibel error for the dosimeter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2800
- — Z (S) $5432
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $12675.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: For the employees operating the powder coater in the powder coat room on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not provide a medical exam to employees required to wear a tight fitting respirator when exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to carbon black and N-Methylpyrrolidone when working in the powder coat room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: For the employees operating the powder coater in the powder coat room on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not provide an annual fit test to employees required to wear a tight fitting respirator when exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to carbon black and N-Methylpyrrolidone when working in the powder coat room
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: For the employees operating the powder coater in the powder coat room on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not provide training to employees prior to requiring employees to wear a tight fitting respirator when exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to carbon black and N-Methylpyrrolidone when working in the powder coat room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $12675.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): For the employees authorized to perform maintenance and servicing of equipment on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not develop equipment specific procedures for each piece of equipment or like pieces of equipment for authorized employees to follow when deenergizing and isolating potentially hazardous sources of energy prior to performing maintenance or service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: For the employees authorized to perform maintenance and servicing of equipment on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not conduct periodic inspections to ensure authorized employees were following procedure when deenergizing and isolating potentially hazardous sources of energy prior to performing maintenance or service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $12675.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: For the Danfoss and SMX Staffing employees operating forklifts on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure all employees had successfully completed training prior to being assigned to operate a forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: For the employees working on and around forklift operators on or about June 27, 2017 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure forklift operator's performance was evaluated every three (3) years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333415)
LAUREL, MS—2026-07-01
THERMO-KOOL
OSSEO, WI—2026-07-01
TITAN AIR, LLLP
OSSEO, WI—2026-06-22
TITAN AIR, LLLP
LA CROSSE, WI—2026-05-28
TRANE U.S. INC.
COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VA—2026-05-26
HILL PHOENIX, INC.
More inspections in AR
LITTLE ROCK, AR—2026-07-09
NABHOLZ CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
FORT SMITH, AR—2026-07-08
HIREQUEST INC.
VAN BUREN, AR—2026-07-08
BEKAERT CORPORATION
SEARCY, AR—2026-07-06
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC
ARKADELPHIA, AR—2026-07-06
JUSTIN KIRKSEY LOGGING, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342429503.