Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: TURN KEY CONTRACTORS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TURN KEY CONTRACTORS LLC in HWYS 158 & C, HARVIELL, MO 63945 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342432846.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turn KEY Contractors LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turn KEY Contractors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HWYS 158 & C
City
HARVIELL
State
MO
ZIP
63945
Mailing
P.O. BOX 122, ELLSINORE, MO 63937
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i):  Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, shall be conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) to ensure that the operator has the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely:    Refresher training had not been conducted for work at the Harviell, MO construction site, as indicated by operation of a powered industrial truck in order to elevate an employee to do work without fall protection (see 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(A)).  There was no three year re-evaluation (See 1910.178(l)(4)(iii)).    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1811
  • · Z (S) $3622

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  The employer had not certified (documented) that any evaluations had been completed, three year or any other refresher training, for use of powered industrial truck(s), such as at the Harviell, MO construction site.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.454 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(3): The employer did not train each employee who performs work on a scaffold, by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards, including the proper use of the scaffold and the proper handling of materials on the scaffold:  At the Harviell, MO construction site, employees who were working off of a scaffold (which would include an extensible boom platform) or who had worked off of a scaffold, such as a walk board, were not trained on what was the proper type of work platform when exposed to a fall hazard.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.454 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(4): The employer did not train each employee who performs work on a scaffold, by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards, including the maximum intended load and the load-carrying capacity of the scaffolds used:   At the Harviell, MO construction site, employees who were working off of a scaffold (which would include an extensible boom platform) or who had worked off of a scaffold, such as a walk board, were not trained on the maximum intended load and load-carrying capacity of scaffolds used.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  At the Harviell, MO construction site, employees who were working off of a scaffold (which would include an extensible boom platform) or who had worked off of a scaffold, such as a walk board, were not trained on all requirements of the standard (1926.503(a)(2)(i) through (iii), (vi) through (viii)), including the procedures to be followed to minimize a fall hazard.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section (fall protection training) by preparing a written certification record which contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  At the Harviell, MO construction site, fall protection training was not documented/certified for employees who were working off of a scaffold (which would include an extensible boom platform) or who had worked off of a walk board.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:    During work at the Harviell, MO construction site, where a powered industrial truck was used to elevate an employee to do work while standing on a pallet, fall protection was not provided.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1811
  • · Z (S) $3622

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342432846.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.