WEST ALLIS, WI —
OSHA Inspection: PRO SE SERVICES
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PRO SE SERVICES in 1323 S. 65TH STREET, WEST ALLIS, WI 53214 (NAICS 238290). OSHA activity number 342451176.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRO SE SERVICES
- Site address
- 1323 S. 65TH STREET
- City
- WEST ALLIS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53214
- Mailing
- 684 BITRITPO COURT, MODESTO, CA 95356
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238290
- Employees
- 32
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use. (a) Employer had not implemented a written respirator protection program with worksite specific procedures for workers required to wear respirators while welding/cutting on metal.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial vehicle. (a) The employer had not trained or evaluated each operator who is authorized to operate the Toyota Forklift model # 8FGU30 Serial # 04490 to ensure they were competent to operate the forklifts safely.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were being placed in services after the examination showed condition(s) adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. (a) Toyota Forklift model # 8FGU30 Serial # 04490 was being used on a daily basis without being inspected before use by operator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,802 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. (a) The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3802
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift. (a) The employer did not have a safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to oxygen/acetylene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. (a) Employees were not provided with information and training from the employer regarding the use of hazardous chemicals that include but not limited to Oxygen/acetylene tanks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,268 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. (a) On or about 7/5/2017 the employer did not supply forms used for recording injuries and illnesses for the calendar years 2014, 2015, 2016 and current year.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $1268
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours. (a) Employer did not report hospitalization of employee until 7/5/17 incident occurred on 7/1/2017
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3000
- — Z (O) $6338
More inspections at PRO SE Services
View PRO SE Services's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238290)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342451176.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.