TENAFLY, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: RAZ,GOLAN & MICHAEL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAZ,GOLAN & MICHAEL in 60 FOREST ROAD, TENAFLY, NJ 07670 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342451556.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAZ,GOLAN & MICHAEL
- Site address
- 60 FOREST ROAD
- City
- TENAFLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07670
- Mailing
- 60 FOREST ROAD, TENAFLY, NJ 07670
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Exterior, On roof: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a pneumatic nail gun and was not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about May 3rd, 2017.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3259
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) Roof: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while conducting framing work on the roof of a structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about May 3rd, 2017.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: A) Exterior, Upper Level : Employees were exposed to fall/ladder collapse hazards as the folding step ladder being used was not opened and locked into place, on or about May 7th, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3259
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342451556.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.