ATLANTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: BEAU DAVIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of BEAU DAVIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. in 75 PIEDMONT AVENUE NE, ATLANTA, GA 30329 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 342453503.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEAU DAVIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Site address
- 75 PIEDMONT AVENUE NE
- City
- ATLANTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30329
- Mailing
- 1375 DECLAIR DRIVE, NE, ATLANTA, GA 30329
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339950
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: 1) Third Floor, Westside of the building: On or about July 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while lifting metal panels weighing approximately 850 to 1,100 pounds, in that personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hats were not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 A01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Each scaffold and/or scaffold component was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it:Note: Exceptions are provided in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5) and (g) of this section. 1) Third floor, West side of the building: On or about July 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while utilizing a mobile scaffold to move metal panels weighing approximately 850 to 1,100 pounds in that the counterweights did not meet the 4 to 1 maximum intended load.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 F01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less: 1) Third Floor, West side of the building: On or about July 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while lowering a 1,100 pound metal panel sign from the 3rd floor to the parking deck, in that the rated capacity of the Bisomac (model # BISOMAC210-1000) hoist was exceeded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.452 W05
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(5): Mobile scaffolds were not stabilized to prevent tipping during movement 1) Third Floor, West side of the building: On or about July 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while lowering the metal panel sign A , in that a mobile scaffold system was not stabilized to prevent tipping when it was pushed to the edge of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9000
- — Z (S) $12675
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. 1) Third floor, West side of the building: On or about July 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 30 feet while working on the 3rd floor near the edge of the parapet wall (approximately 27 inches in height), in that a fall protection system was not provided for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339950)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342453503.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.