Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: FU-TEK MACHINE & TOOLING

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of FU-TEK MACHINE & TOOLING in 15 MARS ST. 104 S. APOLLO ST., ALDA, NE 68810 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 342454071.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fu-Tek Machine & Tooling for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fu-Tek Machine & Tooling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15 MARS ST. 104 S. APOLLO ST.
City
ALDA
State
NE
ZIP
68810
Mailing
104 S. APOLLO ST., ALDA, NE 68810
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333511
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.307 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2017
Abate by
Nov 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,549 · Current $6,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.307(c):     Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location:    The employer is failing to protect employees from a fire and explosion hazard.  This was most recently documented on June 27, 2017 at 15 Mars St, Alda, Nebraska at the mobile mold cleaning station.  This equipment had an electrical installation used to power the pump for the solvent reservoir that was not of an electrical class and division that was appropriate for the solvent being used.   The Solvent according to the SDS being stored in the mold cleaning station was a flammable liquid, category 4 (Flashpoint 140 degrees Fahrenheit or above).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6380
  • · Z (S) $12549

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2017
Abate by
Dec 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,378 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    The employer is failing to train employees on the hazardous chemicals used in the work place resulting in potential inhalation and dermal exposures.  This was most recently documented on June 27, 2017 at 15 Mars Street, Alda Nebraska in the mold cleaning area(s).  The employer failed to train employees when initially assigned on chemicals such as but not limited to Mold Saver, Mold Cleaner, Mold Grease, Enamel and Lacquer Paint, Ethanol, Acetone, WD-40 and Propane.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $5378

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2017
Abate by
Dec 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  The employer failed to accomplish a written certification of its workplace hazard assessment. This was most recently documented  on June 27, 2017 at 15 Mars St, Alda, Nebraska. The employer failed to accomplish or provide upon request a written certificate of the workplace hazard assessment that had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2017
Abate by
Dec 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii):   The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.   The employer failed to ensure that fork lift operators were trained prior to operating the fork lift(s).  This was most recently documented on June 27, 2017 at 15 Mars St, Alda, Nebraska.  The employer did not ensure that operator(s) had successfully completed training consisting of a combination of formal instruction, practical training and evaluation prior to operating powered industrial truck(s).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342454071.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.