Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: MY BEST FRIEND ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC. DBA BELLEMORE ANIMAL HOSPITAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MY BEST FRIEND ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC. DBA BELLEMORE ANIMAL HOSPITAL in 2117 JOHNSON ROAD, GRANITE CITY, IL 62040 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 342454220.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MY Best Friend Animal Hospital, INC. DBA Bellemore Animal Hospital for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MY Best Friend Animal Hospital, INC. DBA Bellemore Animal Hospital is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2117 JOHNSON ROAD
City
GRANITE CITY
State
IL
ZIP
62040
Mailing
2117 JOHNSON ROAD, GRANITE CITY, IL 62040
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541940
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Nov 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,302 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): Each exit route was not adequately lighted so that an employee with normal vision can see along the exit route:    The exit route to the rear door was not adequately lighted so that an employee with normal vision could see along the exit route.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1302
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Nov 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,302 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    The front and rear doors, which were used as exits, were not marked by a sign reading "Exit."
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1302
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.37 B05

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Nov 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):  Along the exit access to the rear exit, the closet door by the rear exit, along with the doorway for the kennel, were not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation and could have been mistaken as an exit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 G02 I D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,302 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i)(D): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by this standard, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by elevation of 2.44 m (8.0 ft) or more above the floor or other working surface:    In the operating room, live electrical wires were observed running along the drop ceiling and powering the fluorescent lighting. The electrical lines, less than 8-feet from the floor, were exposed due to missing ceiling tiles and were not guarded by accidental contact.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1302
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,174 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program which described how workplace labeling, safety data sheet maintenance, and employee training would be met when employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Isothesia.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2174
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on the hazardous chemicals in their work areas such as but not limited to Isothesia. Additionally, the employer did not inform employees where Safety Data Sheets were located at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342454220.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.