BRIDGEPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: GIOVANNI STANCO
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GIOVANNI STANCO in 544 CONNECTICUT AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342457819.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GIOVANNI STANCO
- Site address
- 544 CONNECTICUT AVE.
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06607
- Mailing
- 973 HOWARD AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 544 Connecticut Avenue, Bridgeport, CT 06607 a) Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001a was not received within 10 calendar days (by August 19, 2017) following the Abatement Due Date (August 9, 2017). b) Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001b was not received within 10 calendar days (by September 2, 2017) following the Abatement Due Date (August 23, 2017).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $3,259
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the 32-foot aluminum extension ladder that the employee was required to use to carry plywood to the roof was safe for use.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3259
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use a 32-foot extension ladder was trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342457819.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.