Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: GIANT STONE, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GIANT STONE, LLC in 3501 SAW MILL RUN BOULEVARD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15227 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 342474327.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Giant Stone, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Giant Stone, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GIANT STONE, LLC
Site address
3501 SAW MILL RUN BOULEVARD
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15227
Mailing
3501 SAW MILL RUN BOULEVARD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15227
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   a) In the facility, on or about July 14, 2017 - The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace or obtain employee exposure information for air contaminants such as, but not limited to crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory protection program that includes procedures for the use of respirators in work areas where protection from respiratory hazards is required.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not implement medical evaluations to determine an employees ability to use a tight-fitting respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not ensure that fit testing was conducted on all employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not ensure respirators were cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary and maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not ensure respirators were stored in a manner that protects them from contamination and dust.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 29 CFR 11910.134(k)(1)(i) through (k)(1)(vii).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals in the workplace, such as, but not limited to acetone, crystalline silica, and propane.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):   a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDS) for hazardous chemicals used in the workplace, such as, but not limited to acetone, crystalline silica, and propane.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2017
Abate by
Aug 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) In the facility, on or about July 17, 2017 - The employer did not provide effective information and training to employees on the hazardous chemicals used in the workplace, such as, but not limited to acetone, crystalline silica, and propane.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Giant Stone, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342474327.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.