DARIEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MILAN'S EXPERT RENOVATIONS, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MILAN'S EXPERT RENOVATIONS, LLC in 76 FITCH AVE., DARIEN, CT 06820 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342477411.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILAN'S EXPERT RENOVATIONS, LLC
- Site address
- 76 FITCH AVE.
- City
- DARIEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06820
- Mailing
- 10 FOX RUN RD., NORWALK, CT 06850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use a pneumatic nail gun to install asphalt roofing shingles and metal drip edging was provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffold from which an employee was required to work was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to work from a ladder jack scaffold at a height above 10 feet was trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof at a height above 6 feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the ladder jack scaffold platform at a height above 10 feet was protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working on the residential roof was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the side rails of the extension ladder that the employee was required to use to access the roof extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections at Milan'S Expert Renovations, LLC
View Milan'S Expert Renovations, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342477411.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.