Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARK PAINTER

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARK PAINTER in 222 N MACARTHUR BLVD, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62701 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342478211.

Watch Mark Painter — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mark Painter is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARK PAINTER
Site address
222 N MACARTHUR BLVD
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62701
Mailing
1611 KNOX AVE, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to fall hazards on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to fall hazards on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15ft., on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not ensure employees were using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:     On or about July 19, 2017, the employer did not maintain documentation of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not ensure the extension ladder extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:     On or about July 19, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Springfield, IL, and the employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342478211.