BUFORD, GA —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE RAMIREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE RAMIREZ in POINT ROCK DR, BUFORD, GA 30518 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342490885.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE RAMIREZ
- Site address
- POINT ROCK DR
- City
- BUFORD
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30518
- Mailing
- 4142 MEGAN RD, DULUTH, GA 30096
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: On or about July 19, 2017: a) An employee utilizing a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles on a new residential structure was exposed to eye injuries when the employer failed to ensure that the employee was using protective eye wear while preforming job related tasks. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $3,259
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body narness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. On or about July 19, 2017: a) Employee was exposed to injury when the employer failed to ensure that the fall protection measure he was wearing was appropriate for the job tasks required. The employee was wearing a rock climbing type harness that has an attachment point in the front of the wearers body. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about July 19, 2017: a) the employer failed to properly train his employees in the recognition and the proper corrective steps when they were exposed to fall hazards. Employee was utilizing a rock climber type harness with the attachment point was located in the front of the wearers body. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.1053 A07
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(7): Ladders not specifically designed for such use were tied or fastened together to provide longer sections: On or about July 19,2017: a) Employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 19 to 28 feet when the employer lashed another section of ladder to another ladder making a longer ladder. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) On or about July 19, 2017: a) Employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet when the ladder he was utilizing to gain access to the working area did not extend past the landing at least three feet. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Jose Ramirez
View Jose Ramirez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342490885.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.