Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PACIFIC SANDS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PACIFIC SANDS, INC. in 4611 GREEN BAY ROAD, KENOSHA, WI 53144 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 342491123.

Watch Pacific Sands, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pacific Sands, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PACIFIC SANDS, INC.
Site address
4611 GREEN BAY ROAD
City
KENOSHA
State
WI
ZIP
53144
Mailing
4611 GREEN BAY ROAD, KENOSHA, WI 53144
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a)  The employer failed to provide certification to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1901.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    (a)     There was no written respiratory protection program for the employees using the elastomeric respirators and the filtering facepieces (disposable respirators).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901.2
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.134 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator:    (a)     There was no medical determination obtained for the employees using the elastomeric respirators before the employees were issued the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  (a)     There was no qualitative or quantitative fit testing done for the employees using the elastomeric respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a)     The employee working in the powder room and assigned to wear a tight-fitting respirator had facial hair that came between the respirator and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:    (a)     The two respirators stored by hanging on hooks outside of the powder room were not protected from dirt and deformation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:    (a)     There was no list of hazardous chemicals included as part of the written chemical hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  (a)     The safety data sheets available in the work area were those found next to the small filling line and did not include chemicals that were used in the powder room such as sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, acetone, anhydrous citric acid, sodium metasilicate pentahydrate, zeolite, sodium silicate, anhydrous sodium sulfate, sodium alkylaryl sulphonate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, sodium bicarbonate, soda ash, and 200 proof ethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342491123.