HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ROYAL GOURMET HOUSE INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROYAL GOURMET HOUSE INC. in 2622 MAXIMILIAN ST., HOUSTON, TX 77032 (NAICS 424490). OSHA activity number 342493400.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROYAL GOURMET HOUSE INC.
- Site address
- 2622 MAXIMILIAN ST.
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77032
- Mailing
- 2622 MAXIMILIAN ST., HOUSTON, TX 77032
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424490
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about June 24, 2017 in the warehouse, an employee was exposed to eye hazards when changing out fuel tanks for the propane powered forklift without wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3696
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous condition(s): On or about June 24, 2017 in the warehouse, an employee was exposed to frostbite when changing out the propane tank for the forklift without wearing gloves.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck: On or about June 24, 2017 in the warehouse, the employer did not ensure that each operator was trained according to paragraph (l).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about July 24, 2017 at the site where employees were exposed to chemical hazards when using items such as but not limited to oxygen, acetylene, and propane without the employer having developed a hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: On or about July 24, 2017 at the site where employees were exposed to chemical hazards when using items such as but not limited to oxygen, acetylene, and propane without the safety data sheet being available.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about July 24, 2017 at the site where employees were exposed to chemical hazards when using items such as but not limited to oxygen, acetylene, and propane without the employer having provided training to the workers.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424490)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342493400.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.