LUBBOCK, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: 150 FIFTIETH, LP
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 150 FIFTIETH, LP in 5204 50TH STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79414 (NAICS 561110). OSHA activity number 342497070.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 150 FIFTIETH, LP
- Site address
- 5204 50TH STREET
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79414
- Mailing
- 16479 N. DALLAS PKWY, STE 300, ADDISON, TX 75001
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561110
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1101 E06
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(6): The employer did not ensure that all asbestos work performed within regulated areas was supervised by a competent person: Employees engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments were not supervised by a competent person; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 F02 I
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace: Employees engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments where an exposure assessment was not conducted by a competent person; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 G07 IV
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(7)(iv): All Class II asbestos work was not performed using the work practices and requirements set out in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(iii): Employees engaged in performing Class II work while scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments were not using compliant work practices; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 H01 II
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(ii): Respirators were not used during Class II work where asbestos containing material was not removed in a substantially intact state: Employees engaged in performing Class II work while scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments did not use respirators; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(2)(i): The employer failed to implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) [except (d)(1)(iii)], and (f) through (m), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.1101 to use a respirator: The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program for employees engaged in performing Class II work while scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1101 K01 II
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not include asbestos in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) and ensure each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of the HCS and paragraphs (k)(9) and (10) of this section. The employer did not provide information on at least the following hazards: Cancer and lung effects. Employees engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments were not provided with a Hazard Communication Program containing the health hazards of asbestos; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 K07 I
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7)(i): Warning signs that demarcated the regulated area were not provided and displayed at such a distance from regulated areas that an employee may read the signs an take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs: Warning signs for demarcated areas were not posted to alert employees of asbestos regulated areas where employees were engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1101 K09 IV A
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(A): Employees performing Class II work were not trained in all the elements included in 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(viii) and the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g): Employees engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments were not provided with Class II asbestos training; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1101 L01
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(1): Vacuuming was not done with a HEPA filtered vacuum: Employees utilized a vacuum which was not equipped with a HEPA filter while engaged in scrapping/removing asbestos containing flooring from apartments; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3802.8
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1101 L04 I
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(4)(i): Waste and debris and accompanying dust in an area containing accessible thermal system, surfacing asbestos containing material (ACM) or presumed asbestos containing material, or visibly deteriorated ACM was dusted or swept dry, or vacuumed without using a HEPA filter: Employees dry swept the work area containing asbestos containing material from flooring; exposing employees to asbestos hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342497070.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.