Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AREA SEPTIC INSTALLATION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AREA SEPTIC INSTALLATION, INC. in 4225 CHEROKEE LANE, BROOKFIELD, WI 53045 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 342505815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Area Septic Installation, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Area Septic Installation, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4225 CHEROKEE LANE
City
BROOKFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53045
Mailing
W331 N4544 EMLEY DR., NASHOTAH, WI 53058
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2017
Abate by
Feb 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    (a) The employer did not ensure that an inspection was conducted by a competent person of the connecting device of a Link Belt excavator, model #145X3. During work activities on or about July 27, 2017 an employee was injured when the bucket of the excavator disconnected, falling onto an employee.       (b) The employer did not ensure that a safety program was implemented that called for frequent and regular inspections of items including, but not limited to, fall hazards, struck-by hazards, electrical hazards and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2282
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2017
Abate by
Nov 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems:  (a) The employer did not ensure that both a visual and manual analysis of the soil was conducted. A visual analysis was conducted but not a manual test. The employees were exposed to struck-by hazard and caught-in-between hazards while working in the excavation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2017
Abate by
Nov 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing excavation hazards and implementing excavation protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.652 A01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2017
Abate by
Nov 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,284 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1)(ii): 29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1)(ii):  Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph 29 CFR 1926.652(b) or 29 CFR 1926.652(c) of this section except when: excavations are less than 5 feet (1.52 m) in depth and examination of the ground by a competent person provides no indication of a potential cave-in.      (a) The employer did not ensure that excavation protection was utilized for the protection of employees working in an excavation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2284
  • · Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342505815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.