BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: A-PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A-PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION LLC in 455 TRUMBULL AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342508694.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 455 TRUMBULL AVENUE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 602 NORTH AVENUE 2ND FLOOR, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $1,455 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a). JOBSITE: The employees, required to wear tight fitting respirators had not received a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1455
- — Z (S) $2897
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103). JOBSITE: The employer did not develop and implement a written Respiratory Protection Program where employees were required to wear tight fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103): JOBSITE: The employees required to wear tight fitting respirators had not received a fit test prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (Construction Reference 1926.103): JOBSITE: The employees who were required to wear tight fitting respirators had facial hair.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (Construction Reference 1926.103) JOBSITE: The employees required to wear tight fitting respirators had not been provided with respiratory protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or other equivalent means: JOBSITE: The employees performing roofing activities on a flat roof were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 75 feet 1 inch to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest systems, or other equivalent protective means.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not train each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: JOBSITE: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities on a flat roof were not trained to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59). JOBSITE: The employer did not develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work around hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Cav-Grip.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) JOBSITE: The employees who were required to work around hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Cav-Grip were not provided with information and training on the chemical hazard communications.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at A-Preferred Construction LLC
View A-Preferred Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342508694.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.